Clinical workflows

Pathway-specific workflows where Journai Health may support clinical review. Final clinical responsibility remains with appropriately qualified professionals.

Being validated

Complex record review

Challenge: Extensive records spread across systems make it difficult to build a coherent picture before clinical decisions.
Intended experience: Authorised data is consolidated into a longitudinal timeline and source-linked summary for structured review.
Human review point: Clinician validates summary content, corrects errors and approves before relying on outputs.

Potential pilot measures

· Time spent preparing for patient review
· Clinician-rated usefulness
· Summary correction rate
· Omission detection feedback

Depends on data availability, quality and governance agreements. Not all source systems may be connected initially.

Being validated

Consultation preparation

Challenge: Clinicians may need to review recent activity and outstanding items before an appointment.
Intended experience: Recent encounters, medicines, results and actions are presented in a structured pre-consultation view.
Human review point: Clinician confirms the overview before the consultation and verifies any highlighted items.

Potential pilot measures

· Preparation time
· Information coverage
· Clinician-rated usefulness

Depends on data availability from connected systems and agreed governance arrangements.

In development

Multidisciplinary team preparation

Challenge: MDT preparation often requires manual collation of information from multiple specialties and documents.
Intended experience: Pathway-specific views bring together relevant history, results and correspondence with source links.
Human review point: MDT lead or coordinator reviews and confirms content before the meeting.

Potential pilot measures

· MDT preparation time
· Information coverage
· Qualitative clinician feedback

Requires pathway definition and agreement on information scope with clinical stakeholders.

Planned

Referral triage

Challenge: Referral letters and attachments may not provide complete context for prioritisation decisions.
Intended experience: Referral context is summarised with linked sources and potential gaps highlighted for triage review.
Human review point: Triage clinician confirms prioritisation based on full clinical judgment, not AI output alone.

Potential pilot measures

· Triage preparation time
· Relevant-information coverage
· Workflow completion rate

Pilot scope and data access must be agreed. Triage decisions remain with qualified professionals.

Planned

Handover and discharge

Challenge: Handovers can miss medication changes, follow-up tasks or recent events when records are fragmented.
Intended experience: Discharge-relevant information is consolidated with change highlights and source attribution.
Human review point: Discharging clinician verifies handover content before transfer of care.

Potential pilot measures

· Handover preparation time
· Completeness checks
· Qualitative feedback from receiving teams

Requires integration with local systems and agreed handover templates.

Being validated

Long-term-condition review

Challenge: Longitudinal monitoring data for chronic conditions is often scattered, making structured review inefficient.
Intended experience: Condition-specific longitudinal views support review of trends, gaps and care plan alignment.
Human review point: Reviewing clinician assesses trends and decides on care plan changes.

Potential pilot measures

· Review preparation time
· Monitoring coverage
· Clinician-rated usefulness

Pathway configuration and data completeness vary by condition and organisation.

In development

Research and retrospective analysis

Challenge: Retrospective analysis requires consistent, structured access to longitudinal records under governance.
Intended experience: De-identified or synthetic datasets support evaluation, usability testing and summary quality assessment.
Human review point: Research or clinical leads approve analysis scope and interpret findings.

Potential pilot measures

· Summary quality metrics
· Source-attribution accuracy
· Hallucination and omission test results

Subject to ethics, information governance and data access approvals. Not a substitute for formal research platforms.

Next step

Discuss a clinical information workflow.

Speak with Journai Health about evaluating the platform within a defined workflow in your organisation.

Explore a pilot Contact us

Journai Clinical View

SYN-00482 · Patient context

Illustrative interface

Patient context

Active conditions and recent activity

2 items for review

Conditions

Type 2 diabetes, CKD stage 3, hypertension

Medicines

Metformin, Ramipril, Atorvastatin

Last encounter

GP review, 12 days ago

Outstanding

HbA1c overdue. eGFR trend declining.